“This is a petition for financial compensation or property rights based on parental investment in child-rearing. The plaintiffs claim an implied contract. Let’s proceed with opening statements.”
My parents’ attorney stood. His presentation was smooth, practiced, designed to tug at heartstrings. He talked about sacrifice and duty, about parents who had devoted years to raising two daughters, about reasonable expectations of gratitude and reciprocity. He presented my parents as wounded and betrayed—their generosity thrown back in their faces by an ungrateful daughter who refused to help her struggling sister.
Then Beth stood.
Her opening statement was factual and precise. She outlined my work history, my financial independence, and the documented disparity in parental support between Vanessa and me. She presented it not as a sob story, but as a timeline of facts that spoke for themselves.
The testimony began with my father.
He sat in the witness box looking dignified and hurt—the perfect image of a disappointed parent. My parents’ attorney led him through a series of questions about raising two daughters, providing for our needs, ensuring we had opportunities to succeed.
“Did you treat both daughters equally?” the attorney asked.
“We treated them according to their needs,” my father replied. “Rona was always very independent. She didn’t need as much guidance. Vanessa required more support because she was still finding her path.”
“And when Rona purchased a house, what was your reaction?”
“We were proud of her accomplishment, but we also hoped she would recognize her good fortune and help her sister who hasn’t had the same advantages.”
Beth stood for cross-examination.
“Sir, you stated Rona didn’t need as much guidance. Did she also not receive as much financial support?”
My father shifted. “We supported both our daughters appropriately.”
“Did you pay for Rona’s college education?”
“She chose to attend community college.”
“We offered to help with university costs if she had applied.”
“But you did pay for Vanessa’s university education—full tuition, room, and board.”
“Vanessa attended a four-year institution. Yes.”
“For three separate enrollments, as she withdrew twice and reenrolled. Is that correct?”
My father’s jaw tightened. “She was finding her direction.”
“And each time she withdrew, did you receive any refund on the tuition you had paid?”
“No. But that’s not relevant.”
“I would argue it’s very relevant to the question of equal treatment. How much did you spend on Vanessa’s attempted college education over six years?”
“I don’t have exact figures.”
Beth pulled out a document. “According to university records and your own financial statements provided in discovery, approximately one hundred and twenty thousand dollars. Is that accurate?”
“Approximately,” he said.
“And how much did you contribute to Rona’s community college education?”
The silence stretched long enough to be uncomfortable.
Finally, my father said, “Rona was financially independent.”
“She didn’t ask for help because you had told her to take out loans, hadn’t you?”
“We encouraged her to be self-sufficient.”
“Did you buy Vanessa a car when she turned sixteen?”
“We gave her a used vehicle. Yes.”
“And Rona?”
My father’s gaze flickered.
“Rona purchased her own vehicle because you told her to save up for one, correct?”
He did not answer.
Beth let the silence hang before continuing.
“Over the past five years, have you paid any of Vanessa’s credit card bills?”
“We’ve helped her through difficult periods.”
“How much approximately?”
“I don’t keep track of every dollar spent on my children.”
For complete cooking times, go to the next page or click the Open button (>), and don't forget to SHARE with your Facebook friends.
